Neil Postman. Of course.
Uses the concept of the Viennese philosopher as a book title.
somehow right. Postman praises Kant and Montesquieu and Hume.
NB: Celebrate their Formulierungskkunst. Today, the colleagues are all second-class orator. Students lazy to prepare a second draft. Everything just second rate. I dug out the original extra. It is not in the translation: Even Postman is trying original. Terrible. The stone was to fall on the feet.
In interviews, he is much better than in his book: reading value, which Günter Kaindlstorfer has coaxed him. Postman argues against the postmodern. Derrida, he does not like. Lyotard'm wrong, etc. Post's protests as "true" and "are repealed wrong That you that." Combat "had to -.. By all means even I do not
are his tirades even than postmodern concealed doors. ... He constantly acts as if he performs unique critique of the evils of the culture on television, which deprived the parents of the parenting skills Blubb When you walk through the door. No world only quotes Highly self-referential May I certainly will not ...
Postman is a cultural pessimist. I will not proceed. I think He Lyotard understood to negative. The "end of grand narratives" is meant not pessimistic. It just does. But more on that later.
0 comments:
Post a Comment